Template for Evaluators and Potential Evaluators



Tags: Socio-economic Sciences and Humanities
Evaluator name in English language UZUNIDIS Dimitri
Evaluator name in original language
Country France
Target Sectors Socio-economic Sciences and Humanities
Type of evaluator (current/potential) Potential evaluator
Position Professor at the U. of Littoral, France
Telephone +33 6 72 74 02 87
Fax +33 3 28 23 71 34
Address ULCO, MRSH, 21, quai de la citadelle 59140 Dunkerque, France
Current employer University of Littoral, Lille Nord de France, France
Website of employer in English language http://rri.univ-littoral.fr
Website of employer in original language
Type of Employer National, University


Link to personal profile or biography of evaluator
Link 1 http://rrifr.univ-littoral.fr/wp-content/uploads/2008/06/cv-
uzunidis.pdf


Type of desired evaluation experience RTDI Programmes and/or Funding Instruments, Research and Innovation Infrastructures, Institutions
Short bio on the professional experience
Languages that can be used in RTDI evaluations English, French, Greek
Completed EVAL-INNO Training No
Date of entry 2012-05-01 08:56:22
Last modified 2012-05-02 14:42:43
Type of evaluator’s experience based on the objects of performed evaluations RTDI Programmes and/or Funding Instruments, Research and Innovation Infrastructures, Institutions


Type of awarding body/contractor for the evaluation(s) (current and past)


Type of evaluator International - in country of the European Union
International - in other European country (non Member-State)
International - in a non-European country
National
Number of evaluations 26
Sectoral dimension of the evaluations Socio-economic Sciences and Humanities
Description of the evaluation methods
Problems encountered
Commentary on evaluation needs of the country
Commentary on individual professional needs of the evaluator
Most relevant directorate or section


Methodology of the evaluation
Sources of Information Objective Type of Method Ex Ante Interim Terminal Ex Post Ad Hoc
Foresight/Technology Assessment (Strategic) Impact Assessment Articulation and road mapping of development of new technologies Qualitative Semiquantitative X X
Cost-efficiency Assesses sustainability Assesses efficiency Qualitative / semiquantitative methodologies
Cost-benefit analysis Assesses sustainability Assesses efficiency Quantitative (with qualitative elements)
Innovation Surveys Detects trends and insights Identifies size and distribution of impacts Provides groups comparisons and changes over time Semiquantitative (Statistical data analysis) X X X
Benchmarking Comparison method across different sectors Support to systemic evaluation Quantitative (Statistical data analysis)
Macroeconomic modeling and simulation Determine the efficiency and efficacy Quantitative modelling methodology
Productivity analysis Determine the efficiency and efficacy Quantitative modelling methodology
Microeconomic evaluation studies Provide a quantitative estimation of the impact Control for different effects: expenditures, innovation capacity Quantitative qualitative categorical data
Control group approaches Capture the impact of policy intervention on the programme participant entity Quantitative Modelling methodology
Interviews and field/case studies Impact Assessment Qualitative Semiquantitative X X X
Expert Panels/Peer Review Impact Assessment Qualitative Semiquantitative
Network Analysis Impact Assessment Assesses Co-operation linkages Qualitative Semiquantitative X X X


Copyright 2011 Eval-Inno